While we are not among those championing a Hillary candidacy 1, the Rethugs are taking it for granted. More, the richest among them — tone-deaf to the obvious irony of the situation — are already planning on how to pre-select the 2016 GOP presidential candidate without all that messy democracy stuff:
Dozens of the Republican Party’s leading presidential donors and fund-raisers have begun privately discussing how to clear the field for a single establishment candidate to carry the party’s banner in 2016, fearing that a prolonged primary would bolster Hillary Rodham Clinton, the likely Democratic candidate.
The conversations, described in interviews with a variety of the Republican Party’s most sought-after donors, are centered on the three potential candidates who have the largest existing base of major contributors and overlapping ties to the top tier of those who are uncommitted: Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida and Mitt Romney.
All three are believed to be capable of raising the roughly $80 million in candidate and “super PAC” money that many Republican strategists and donors now believe will be required to win their party’s nomination.
But the reality of all three candidates vying for support has dismayed the party’s top donors and “bundlers,” the volunteers who solicit checks from networks of friends and business associates. They fear being split into competing camps and raising hundreds of millions of dollars for a bloody primary that will injure the party’s eventual nominee — or pave the way for a second-tier candidate without enough mainstream appeal to win the general election.
Ray Washburne, finance chairman for the Republican National Committee. Credit Allison V. Smith for The New York Times. “If you are philosophically a center-right donor, I think you have an interest in clearing the field,” said Bobbie Kilberg, a top Republican fund-raiser in Virginia with ties to Mr. Romney and the Bush family. “I think that’s important because there is clearly going to be a competition of philosophies for who is going to be the presidential nominee. And I firmly believe that person has to be from the center-right.”
The obvious catch here is the inconvenient fact that party delegates, and those back home who elect them, feel it’s their Gawd-given right as Americans to elect whatever crazy they wish instead of going along with the GOP’s 1%. And here’s where the irony comes in: the lumpen masses usually vote for the hard-core right-wing crazies (Cruz, the Rand Family, Sarah “Can’t Shoot for Shit” Palin…) the GOP’s 1% have not-so-subtly funded.
On its face, a thoroughly risible situation.
However it’s worth remembering that a democracy is only as good as the lowest common denominator voter; is Hillary our only choice?
Wake up, people.
- Her presence always puts us in mind of Hansel and Gretel’s selfish step-mother. Yes, we recognize this is a purely unbidden visceral reaction on our part, however it is easily augmented by the many many many facts of her prior political tendencies; your emotional knee-jerk reactions may vary. ↩