Political Polarization

Political polarization has ushered in a new era in state government, where single-party control of the levers of power has produced competing Americas. One is grounded in principles of lean and limited government and on traditional values; the other is built on a belief in the essential role of government and on tenets of cultural liberalism.

These opposing visions have been a staple of national elections, and in a divided Washington, this polarization has resulted in gridlock and dysfunction. But today, three-quarters of the states — more than at any time in recent memory — are controlled by either Republicans or Democrats. Elected officials in these states are moving unencumbered to enact their party’s agenda.

Republican states have pursued economic and fiscal strategies built around lower taxes, deeper spending cuts and less regulation. They have declined to set up state health-insurance exchanges to implement President Obama’s Affordable Care Act. They have clashed with labor unions. On social issues, they have moved to restrict abortion rights or to enact voter-identification laws, in the name of ballot integrity, that critics say hamper access to voting for the poor and minorities.

Blue states have also been forced to cut spending, given the budgetary pressures caused by the recession. But rather than cutting more deeply, a number of them also have raised taxes to pay for education or infrastructure. They have backed the president on the main elements of his health-care law. The social-issue agenda in blue states includes legalizing same-sex marriages, providing easier access to voting and, in a handful of cases, imposing more restrictions on guns.

The values that underpin these governing strategies reflect contrasting political visions, and the differences can be seen in stark terms in the states. In a red state such as Texas, government exists mostly to get out of the way of the private sector while holding to traditional social values. In blue states such as California and Maryland, government takes more from taxpayers, particularly the wealthy, to spend on domestic priorities while advancing a cultural agenda that reflects the country’s growing diversity.

Three quarters of the states.

What we find interesting here is –due to the Great Recession, prevailing sub-standard wages and a general lack of jobs– people tend to move less than in the 80s and 90s. Once a person/family lands somewhere, they tend to stick. So: given the gerrymandering at both the state and national levels combined with the continued political polarization of the lumpenproletariat 1, the “culture wars” will not only continue unabated but actually intensify as the GOP steadily moves away from evolution toward marrying its children off as actual children while the Left stands around playing pocket pool and poorly masking its disdain.

It may well be that the pendulum is set to swing back the other way and the GOP will soon undo — or attempt to undo– many progressive changes.

WNBTv - Good TV!

Show 1 footnote

  1. Yes, this is the correct term; to suggest the Tea Baggers or the Christian Crazies are aware that they’re being played by the professional politicians is to impute ulterior motives to zombies.

Something to say...?