What could possibly go wrong?

This photo was taken by bre pettis on August 4, 2006 using a Canon PowerShot SD600. Some rights reserved.

After two years of practice, the animals developed some mastery, getting about 75 percent of the easier matches correct and 40 percent of the harder ones, markedly better than chance guessing.

The monkeys were implanted with a tiny probe with two sensors; it was threaded through the forehead and into two neighboring layers of the cerebral cortex, the thin outer covering of the brain.

The two layers, called L-2/3 and L-5, are known to communicate with each other during decision making of the sort that the monkeys were doing when playing the matching game.

The device recorded the crackle of firing neurons during the animals’ choices and transmitted it to a computer. Researchers at U.S.C., led by Theodore Berger, analyzed this neural signal, and determined its pattern when the monkeys made correct choices.

To test the device, the team relayed this “correct” signal into the monkeys’ brains when they were in the middle of choosing a possible picture match, and it improved their performance by about 10 percent.

The researchers then impaired the monkeys’ performance deliberately, by dosing them with cocaine. Their scores promptly fell by 20 percent.

“But when you turn on the stimulator, they don’t make those errors; in fact, they do a little better than normal,” said Robert E. Hampson of Wake Forest, a study author. 1 2

WNBTv - Good TV!

Show 2 footnotes

  1. No, they’re not doing this on human “volunteers.” Yet. You will know when they do. Some fine folks from the government will approach and and offer to “transfer you to a secure facility tomorrow, for your safety.” I don’t know if a small cash stipend, say $500, will be offered.
  2. Also? The title of the article: “Brain Implant Improves Thinking in Monkeys”? No offense, but most anything would improve monkeys’ critical thinking skills.

2 Replies to “What could possibly go wrong?”

Something to say...?